Download Ace in the Hole: Why the United States Did Not Use Nuclear by Timothy J. Botti PDF

By Timothy J. Botti

Utilizing newly published records, the writer provides an built-in examine American nuclear coverage and international relations in crises from the Berlin blockade to Vietnam. The publication solutions the query why, whilst the atomic bomb have been used with such devastating impact opposed to the japanese Empire in 1945, American leaders placed this so much apocalyptic of guns again at the shelf, by no means for use back in anger. It records the myopia of Potomac strategists in regarding the U.S. in wars of attrition in Korea and Southeast Asia, marginal components the place American important pursuits have been by no means endangered. regardless of the presence of thousands, then hundreds of thousands of nuclear bombs and warheads within the nation's stockpile, the best army weapon in historical past turned politically very unlikely to take advantage of. And but overwhelming nuclear superiority did serve its final objective within the chilly battle. while American important pursuits have been threatened—over Berlin and Cuba—the Soviets subsidized down from war of words. regardless of error in strategic judgment caused by worry of Communist growth, and at times outright incompetence, the ace within the gap proved decisive.

Show description

Read or Download Ace in the Hole: Why the United States Did Not Use Nuclear Weapons in the Cold War, 1945 to 1965 (Contributions in Military Studies) PDF

Similar nuclear books

Nuclear Magnetic Shieldings and Molecular Structure

Glossy techniques to the theoretical computation and experimental selection of NMR protective tensors are defined in twenty-nine papers in keeping with lectures offered on the NATO ARW. the entire most well-liked computational tools are reviewed and up to date growth is defined of their software to chemical, biochemical, geochemical and fabrics technological know-how difficulties.

Additional info for Ace in the Hole: Why the United States Did Not Use Nuclear Weapons in the Cold War, 1945 to 1965 (Contributions in Military Studies)

Example text

As an additional reward for its aggression. S. was not going to abandon 20 million South Koreans and see them murdered by the Communists. He would rather "fight to the finish" than cut and run, he told Attlee. S. not only buckets of blood unrevenged but severe loss of face in the eyes of Asian peoples, especially the Japanese. Preferring to call his plan "honorable withdrawal," the Prime Minister asked for an American commitment not to engage in retaliatory air and naval attacks once the disengagement occurred.

N. S. to engage in war with the inexhaustible hordes of Red China. Acheson added that MacArthur should stop the Chinese drive as soon as possible, form a defensive line across the peninsula, and hold it until South Korean forces were strong enough to take over. All this talk of limited war prompted Admiral Sherman to complain that American forces would have no choice but to hit back hard if bombed by planes flying from Manchuria. 3 Over the next 48 hours, South Korean forces on the right flank of Eighth Army continued to crumble so that at a press conference on November 30, Truman said that use of atomic bombs in Korea was always under active consideration.

Forgetting what he had been told about the concentration of Soviet population and industry in a few targets, he confided to a meeting of NATO's Foreign Ministers on April 3, 1949 that atomic bombs alone could probably not overthrow the sprawling Soviet empire. Although he assured leaders of Congress three days later that he still had the fire in the belly to pull the atomic trigger if necessary, he ordered Johnson to undertake yet another study of the air-atomic plan and its potential effectiveness.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.86 of 5 – based on 25 votes